Saturday, March 23, 2013

The War on Easter!

According to modern day Luddite Bill O'Reilly, of Fox News fame, the secular left is waging an all-out assault on Easter. Here is one of his rants about it.



So there it is, because of spring egg hunts and name changes we are regressing into an immoral secular society with rampant abortions and persecution of Christians EVERYWHERE!

I've decided to join the propaganda side of the war effort and assault the Christians by using their holiday imagery as a backdrop for my Peeps bunny orgy. They are titled, in order, Bunny Blowjob, Bunny Bukkake and The Missionary Bunnies. Enjoy, fellow heathens!






Friday, March 1, 2013

Sticks and Stones May Break Bones...

..but words will never hurt me.

Or will they?



Recently a hot-button issue in some of the online communities I engage with has been the use of language and whether certain slurs, when aimed at a specific person, are indicative of an insult to the entire gender group of that person. The argument in favor of this proposition is basically that the use of gendered slurs such as pussy, dick, prick, twat, cunt and bitch denote that being of that gender or possessing the genitalia mentioned is inherently a wrong, dirty or vile thing. Additionally extra emphasis is placed on taking offense to the female-oriented words cunt and bitch in a theoretical framework that women are inherently more susceptible to being damaged as a group by these words than men are because using similar male-oriented slurs is "punching upwards" at a target of more societal power. This of course leads to the rationale that women need more shelter from the use of sharp and harsh sounding monosyllabic words.

While I can understand and appreciate that many feel the need to cry out at what they see as sexist and misogynistic, I'm not so sure this attempt by many at policing of common language is a very effective method of calling out actual misogynists or done with a good grasp of how to judge the dictionary definition of a used word versus the evolution of how people use it casually and the intent and aim of the person who has uttered it.

Let's start with a demonstration of  how certain words and phrases that are common in everyday English can be used to denote a general emotion or sentiment while the actual definitions of the words are ignored or neglected. I am an atheist who doesn't believe in any gods and thinks the historicity of Jesus Christ is questionable at best. Despite the fact that I don't accept the idea of a god existing I still, by virtue of having lived my entire life in the United States, catch myself uttering phrases like "God damn it!" or "Jesus Fucking Christ!" when I get annoyed at various situations. These phrases are so ubiquitous to the culture that I am in, and used so casually as generalized expressions of frustration that the actual relevance to whether or not the nouns and verbs contained within are blasphemous or indicate a belief in a god or hell is almost null and void, with the exception of believing Christians who take the commandments of the Bible seriously. Our culture has grown so accustomed to people using these phrases with such a wide variety of intentions that most people outside of conservative Christians don't actually really consider the theological or religious merits when they speak them. Over time they have morphed to become synonymous with many generalized expressions of anger and annoyance.

I argue that the same can be said of gendered slurs such as cunt or bitch. Many people immediately label the simple saying of these words as misogynistic, or at the very least indicating a sexist mindset. I would instead approach each use of the words on a case by case basis and look at the context and intent of the speaker/writer before making a value judgment. Did the person say something like "Women are just a bunch of cunts, I hate all the bitches"? That would be a clear case of someone using the words in an attempt to express a dislike of women or the very idea of being a woman. However, if someone says "Janet is being such a bitch!", all we can really take from that is the person is expressing a dislike of Janet, not taking a stab at all womankind. Is it sexist? Well, it's still not easy to say because things get even murkier when you factor in how many flexible and malleable definitions these words have.

Most people are not saying you are actually vaginal tissue if they call you a cunt, nor a female canine if they call you a bitch, nor a penis if they tell you you're a dick. When someone is trying to express a heightened emotional state like anger or disgust they often resort to certain words of ballistic offense power to get their point across in the most direct and attention-grabbing way possible. The actual dictionary definitions or sociological implications of the words will likely be disregarded in favor of pure emotional firepower. Oftentimes the most potent of the arsenal are these harsh sounding monosyllabic words like fuck, shit, bitch, cunt and dick that generations of people with rather puritanical aversions to even simple mentions of sexual organs or acts turned into tempting taboos for those wanting to be subversive or deliberately offensive. In that sort of culture the words take on a life beyond whatever they originally described and become all-purpose slurs, useable in numerous ways that have absolutely nothing to do with the gender politics or identities of the targets. In most instances tradition trumps the dictionary.

But beyond the simple need to analyze each word's usage in the context of who said it, how it was said and the intent behind it, I feel the gender politics of taking offense to the very existence of the words is a bit insulting. This whole idea that I would somehow by way of owning a vagina need to have an extra barrier of societal protection from hearing one slur over another is nothing short of misguided benevolent sexism. I feel that the people who most loudly cry out in advocacy of these words being misogynistic or sexist are the most intent on maintaining a narrative of obnoxious gender roles and stereotypes and help perpetuate the idea that women are somehow not as strong as men in dealing with someone uttering controlled sounds from their vocal chords.

How absurd. How backwards thinking that is. Quite honestly that sort of thing gets under my skin more than when someone calls me a bitch. At least the person saying bitch is being honest about how they think and feel.


Friday, February 22, 2013

A Moment of Vitriol

This is a quickie cross-post from my commentary I posted on the Slymepit internet forum. For those who don't pay attention to the internet atheist and skeptic scenes, just know that there's been a nearly 2 years running internet drama between various bloggers, conference speakers and personalities spanning multiple networks, organizations, forums and Twitter. It's all very convoluted, so please disregard this if you have no interest in this sort of subject matter.

So I'm really, really annoyed at the website The Raw Story for publishing this crap from Amanda Marcotte:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/22/d ... Cc.twitter

Wherein she accuses Dr. Hall of trying to denigrate women's roles in skepticism as an attempt to garner attention as a "token". You know what Marcotte: FUCK YOU. Your friends and allies refer to any woman who disagrees with yours or your allies' shameful tactics of doxxing, lying about people and bullying while claiming the mantle of victimhood as "gender traitors", "chill girls" and now "tokens"? Again: FUCK YOU.

You DO NOT represent us, stop trying to pretend like you give a shit about any woman other than yourself. The fact that you would use derogatory terms like "token" towards other women in the skeptic scene while trying to pretend you act on behalf of all women interested and involved in skepticism is nothing but your own ego-trip messiah complex kicking in.

Oh, and if I didn't make it clear already: FUCK YOU.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

For Some People, Reality is a Bitch

Scrolling through some of my news feeds this morning I came across an article  from the Atlantic Wire chronicling the billionaire Koch brothers trying to go through and clean house in an effort to figure out why all their money and all their lobbying failed to secure the 2012 elections for the Republican Party. While this sort of soul searching has been occurring across the board in many Tea Party, Republican and neoconservative groups for the last few months, it's been particularly noteworthy with the richest donors, who have been relying one one tactic to consistently garner results: pumping the millions upon millions of the dollars they are subsidized by Bush era tax cuts and loopholes with and using it to ensure they continue their little tax holidays and shelters that don't apply to the middle class folks who on average pay a larger percentage of income.

While the Koch brothers and Karl Rove try and play damage control, fire entire staffs, and conduct costly audits to figure out why they threw all of that money away, it astonishes me that they fail to see that they have all the answers right at their fingertips if they would just open their eyes to the world that exists outside of their little bubble of Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, fundraising dinners with rich old folks and schmoozing inside the Washington beltway.

Within this sheltered neoconservative echo-chamber they have failed to take notice of the drastic changes underway in the United States. The have failed to adapt to their environment, and for a species of political activist born out of the 1980s and 1990s era mindset of pandering almost exclusively to southern white evangelical Christian men or rich Wall Street types and CEOs, they have become obsolete as the environment has changed around them. What 2012 may have told them, had they been paying attention, is that they need to evolve or face extinction.

Well, what could they possibly have failed to notice? It's quite simple really:

1) The constant pandering to extremist Christian groups such as those headed by people like Pat Robertson, James Dobson and Ralph Reed has alienated many moderate and liberal Christians. It has also alienated people of minority faiths and people of no faith , who now are the fastest rising group in the United States and who are no longer content to sit on the sidelines while Christian bigots want to take away reproductive rights, promote discrimination of LGBT people and dumb down America's children by turning our public school systems into cesspools of anti-science garbage and anti-historical fact revisionism.

This tactic of appealing to an increasingly vitriolic and extremist branch of theocratic-leaning Christian activists may have been a great tactic during the 1980s and 1990s, but as each successive generation of voters that comes up becomes more secular, more tolerant of equal rights for LGBT people and less interested in the "us versus them" mentality of the Christian right it's become a tactic doomed to failure on the national level. When your fervor to protect fetuses leads to many political candidates making absurd statements about rape that cost them the race in even some pretty safe-bet districts, you might want to reconsider how much you have sipped of the religious right Kool Aid.

2) People are tired of being lied to. Fox News has seen it's ratings drop consistently as of late, as even many diehard conservatives are seeing the channel's propaganda efforts and attempts at spin as bullshit of the highest caliber. It's been widely known that the radio ratings for neoconservative radio shows has been overinflated. For all the efforts to fool the public, these media sources have seen the internet's rise to proninence hurt their credibility as people now carry always-connected devices in their pockets which they can do a fact-checking search in mere minutes.

3) The hypocrisy of the modern neoconservative movement has alienated many. For a party that talks of fiscal responsibility, they seem to spend as much as the Democrats when they do hold power. They also favor increasing the size of government when it comes to promoting the regulation of morality and in trying to police the world with an over-extended military budget and interventionist foreign policy which is unsustainable financially and which is causing our veterans of overseas policing campaigns to come back riddled with PTSD and committing suicides at a rate equal to the death tolls of the Iraq occupation and conflict.

Don't get me wrong, as someone of Korean-American ethnicity, whose grandparents survived the Korean War in the 1950s, I recognize that without the aid of foreign military power that I would not exist. My grandparents would possibly have been killed by the DPRK and most assuredly they would have never gotten the chance to immigrate to America under the oppressive rule of the totalitarian North Korean government. I recognize that American intervention staved off the slaughter and brutality the North Koreans were inflicting on people in the southern Korean peninsula region, and am thankful that international aid has helped keep South Korea as a peaceful free society. But the United States is now over-extending itself to support an ever increasing war machine, one that equals the size of most of the rest of the UN combined. We spent trillions on a derail in Iraq which threw us off mission in our quest to target Al-Qaeda, and our insistence on continuing military spending programs that even the Pentagon is saying they have no use for should be something of concern for fiscal conservatives.

Additionally as the libertarian wing of the conservative moment grows to prominence, they are increasingly seeing the Republican party and their donors like the Kochs and Rove as a good old boys club who like to abuse the grassroots while giving out government subsidies to powerful lobby interests. Perhaps the dumbest thing the Republican party did for their image amongst the younger demographics was their efforts to shut Ron Paul out of the RNC last fall and force the narrative of solidarity behind Mitt Romney's campaign. For a growing libertarian group who is tired of the battles over social rights issues and wants to focus more on fiscal issues and government size, this action led by the elites who run the GOP was basically a statement of "fuck you" to the future of the conservative movement.

When it's all said and done, the answers that people like the Koch brothers are searching for are in plain sight. Their problem is they are so set in their ways, and so used to doubling down on the same old tactics of the past that they have failed to notice that they are leading their party to extinction. Along the way their sort of activism and support for hypocrites and extremists has helped hurt the country financially and hurt it's image and standing in the global marketplace. The time has come for these people to adapt to the changing climate of American society or die out as a movement and become a relic of history.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Room Full of Crazy Has Returned

So after about half a year of this blog having been wiped off the face of the internet and left as an emptied relic, I've decided to resurrect Room Full of Crazy.

If any of the small number of readers that frequented this place before actually return and are wondering what happened six months ago, well it's a long and complicated story, but let's just go with the primary reason for the deletion of everything on this blog being me feeling I was over-exerting myself on too many projects. Additionally the low readership numbers helped guide my decision to give this place the axe, despite the effort I had put into trying to keep daily feature length articles posted. I just felt this was one venue where I was not seeing the return on time invested, especially after the effort to switch to Blogger and away from Wordpress, whose services I was not terribly impressed with.

However, as I continued to scale back on various online projects and got to the point where I had an almost nonexistent online presence I always felt sorta bad about what happened to this place, since RFoC was the one place where I felt completely unrestrained in how to express my thoughts on any topic I felt like covering. After this much time and rethinking, I've decided to go ahead and give Room Full of Crazy another effort.This time around I will be posting at a less frequent rate so as to not burn out again, and I will NOT be dual posting in Korean since the amount of Korean residents reading about American debates on politics, religion, science, philosophy and culture will likely be zero, and the addition of the Google translate app in the sidebar makes any dual language posting unnecessary. (Go ahead and see what this blog looks like in Arabic for fun)

So with that said let's go ahead and get this ball rolling and see what sort of trainwreck I cause!
And feel free to rage as much as you want in the comments sections, because RFoC is a free speech zone, with the only moderation stemming from the necessary blockage if commercial adbots start appearing or if anyone is stupid enough to post illegal shit like threats or anything that might be filed under DMCA abuses (no pirates promoting warez, got it?).